{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xlsx","n_sheets":3,"sheets":["Operational data","Workforce data","Office-based env impacts"],"read":"whole","date_system":"1900"}

{"sheet":"Operational data","index":0,"n_rows":126,"n_cols":8,"rows_kept":126,"merged":[[52,0,53,0],[52,1,53,1],[52,2,53,2],[59,1,61,1],[59,2,61,2],[59,3,61,3],[109,0,109,1],[114,0,114,1],[118,0,118,1],[119,0,121,0],[119,2,121,2],[122,0,124,0],[122,2,124,2]]}
[]
["Pollution reports \nIn 2014–15, EPA received over 10,800 pollution reports from the community and industry. Over 85 per cent of all pollution reports are from the community. Table 6.1 shows an eight per cent reduction from the previous year.\n"]
["Table 6.1: Total pollution reports"]
[null,"2015",2014,2013,2012]
["Total pollution reports",{"v":11172,"d":"11,172"},{"v":12005,"d":"12,005"},{"v":12094,"d":"12,094"},{"v":10723,"d":"10,723"}]
["Table 6.2: Pollution reports by region"]
[null,"Metro","South Metro","South West","Gippsland","North West","North East"]
["Odour",{"v":1540,"d":"1,540"},{"v":1010,"d":"1,010"},387,282,203,208]
["Noise",873,225,176,85,232,59]
["Waste",783,360,229,165,182,113]
["Water",892,252,190,207,112,132]
["Dust",335,169,190,181,51,47]
["Smoke",152,42,38,55,30,32]
["Emergency",153,47,30,17,10,21]
["Total (1)",{"v":4728,"d":"4,728"},{"v":2105,"d":"2,105"},{"v":1240,"d":"1,240"},992,820,612]
["1. 675 pollution reports were not allocated as at 30 June 2015"]
[]
["Brooklyn Industrial Precinct"]
["In 2014–15, there were 17 days above the goal for MP10 in the Brooklyn Industrial Estate. This is the lowest number of days over the limit since targeted monitoring began in 2009. The result is particularly positive given the low amount of rainfall, which reduces dust, for the year. Odour reports continue to be at record low levels."]
["Table 6.4: Brooklyn Industrial Precinct summary statistics"]
["Indicator","note",2015,2014,2013,2012,2011,2010]
["Days where dust levels (PM10) exceeded the limit",1,17,29,33,20,19,40]
["Rainfall (mm)",2,383,459,387,611,850,"n/a"]
["Pollution reports related to odour",null,166,148,421,487,628,1250]
["1. Results for 2009–10 reflect estimates from available data."]
["2. Further analysis of pollution reports related to odour has resulted in revised numbers for previous periods. "]
[]
["Delivery of the Annual Compliance Plan"]
["Table 6.5: Performance against targets in the Annual Compliance Plan"]
["Indicator","Notes","2015 target","2015 actual"]
["Percentage of licensed sites will have received a licence compliance inspection in the last three years",null,{"v":1,"d":"100%"},{"v":1,"d":"100%"}]
["Percentage of annual performance statements (APSs) reviewed and compared to information held by EPA",null,{"v":1,"d":"100%"},{"v":1,"d":"100%"}]
["Detailed site-based assessments of APSs",null,30,31]
["Targeted inspections resulting from intelligence from waste transport certificates, APSs, National Pollutant Inventory (NPI), landfill levies or financial assurances",1,60,26]
["Percentage of incidents requiring immediate attendance (high environmental risk/likelihood of detection and mitigation) inspected",null,{"v":0.95,"d":"95%"},{"v":0.99,"d":"99%"}]
["Percentage of incidents requiring planned attendance (moderate environmental risk/ likelihood of detection and mitigation) inspected",null,{"v":0.9,"d":"90%"},{"v":0.99,"d":"99%"}]
["Percentage of works approvals, research, development and demonstration approvals (RD&Ds) and exemptions assessed for works complete upon duty holder notification",null,{"v":1,"d":"100%"},{"v":1,"d":"100%"}]
["Percentage of high-risk 30A emergency discharge approvals inspected",2,{"v":0.9,"d":"90%"},"n/a"]
["Closed landfill inspections",null,26,29]
["Percentage of notices complied with by the due date or escalated in line with the EPA’s Compliance and Enforcement Policy (EPA publication: 1388)",3,{"v":0.9,"d":"90%"},{"v":0.87,"d":"87%"}]
["Percentage of inspected sites that had an identified operator receive an inspection report",4,{"v":1,"d":"100%"},{"v":0.98,"d":"98%"}]
["1.  EPA uses a number of intelligence sources to direct its activities. Overall, EPA undertook 410 targeted inspections. The intelligence resources referred to in this measure are valuable tools that inform EPA action which is not always limited to an inspection."]
["2.  EPA issued six approvals for discharge under section 30A of the EP Act, in assessing the risk to environment and human health, EPA decided that the approvals did not trigger an inspection."]
["3.  Performance reflects EPA having followed up on a higher number of remedial notices than in previous years."]
["4.  A small number of sites were yet to receive an inspection report as at 30 June 2015."]
[]
["67ACs"]
["Under the EP Act, a Magistrate can direct a company to fund a community environmental impact project as an alternative to a fine from the court."]
["Table 6.6: Summary of 67AC orders implemented in 2014–15"]
["Company","Community Group","Amount Funded","Project"]
["Barro Group Pty Ltd","Murrindindi Climate Network Inc.",{"v":64800,"d":"$64,800"},"Developed a voluntary green code of practice to improve environmental performance of small and medium size business in the tourism, retail and services sectors."]
["Barro Group Pty Ltd","Yea Wetlands Trust",{"v":60000,"d":"$60,000"},"Designed and installed the Interpretive Education Display which forms a part of the new Water Discovery Information Centre in Yea."]
["Golden Circle Limited","Friends of the Gorge",{"v":50000,"d":"$50,000"},"Improved the aquatic environment of the Morang Wetlands by reintroducing Growling Grass Frogs, planting aquatic and terrestrial flora, drought-proofing quarry wetlands, controlling pest plants and animals, and establishing a water quality monitoring regime. "]
[{"$nulls":3},"Enabled specialist technical advice and assistance to the Friends of the Gorge and water quality training for the community and local school children by Healthy Waterways Waterwatch and Darebin Creek Management Committee personnel. "]
["Mecrus Pty Ltd","Gippsland Climate Change Network",{"v":75000,"d":"$75,000"},"Developed a Sustainability Fellowship Program for 40 participants from the community, business and government sectors across Gippsland’s six municipalities.  "]
["Mobil Refining Australia Pty Ltd","Port Philip Eco Centre Inc.",{"v":150000,"d":"$150,000"},"Enabled the recruitment, coordination and training of volunteer guides to educate visitors about the St Kilda penguin colony and the Bay’s natural values and the expansion of a litter reduction project. "]
["Nuplex Industries (Aust) Pty Ltd","Rural City of Wangaratta",{"v":160000,"d":"$160,000"},"Undertook tree planting and landscaping in key streetscape areas of Sisely Avenue and Wareena Park, Wangaratta, which had been affected by the pollution incident. "]
["Schutz DSL (Australia) Pty Ltd","Western Melbourne Catchment Network",{"v":40000,"d":"$40,000"},"Weed clearing, building a rabbit-proof fence and restoring the Cherry Creek Grassland to its natural state by planting indigenous grasses."]
["SITA Australia (Enforceable Undertaking)","City of Casey",{"v":50000,"d":"$50,000"},"Landscaping and planting mature trees at Elliot Kingsfield Reserve, Lynbrook."]
["SITA Australia","Port Phillip and Westernport Catchment",{"v":5000,"d":"$5,000"},"Delivered works including revegetation, weed and rubbish removal. community awareness raising activities in River Gum Creek Reserve, Hampton Park and Birds of River Gum Creek educational material and associated activities. "]
[]
["(Enforceable Undertaking)"]
["Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd","Portland Community Garden Landcare Group Inc.",{"v":80000,"d":"$80,000"},"Developed a community garden on the old Portland High School site. "]
[]
["Summary of compliance, enforcement and assessment activities"]
["The table below provides a statistical summary of EPA's compliance, enforcement and assessment activities during 2014-15 "]
["Table 6.7: Compliance, enforcement and assessment activities"]
["Activity","Note",2015,2014,2013]
["Industry programs"]
["Inspections",1,{"v":2252,"d":"2,252"},{"v":2950,"d":"2,950"},{"v":2566,"d":"2,566"}]
["Pollution abatement notices",null,300,265,220]
["Clean up notices",null,233,206,125]
["Minor works pollution abatement notices",null,76,88,92]
["Official warnings",2,94,36,33]
["Penalty infringement notices",2,64,29,28]
["Environmental audits completed",null,218,207,200]
["Works approvals issued",null,26,31,44]
["Applications exempt from the need for approval",null,36,19,"-"]
["Licences amended / transferred",null,56,54,62]
["Planning referrals advised on",null,787,795,532]
["Vehicle programs"]
["Noisy vehicle notice",3,{"v":1731,"d":"1,731"},{"v":2141,"d":"2,141"},{"v":4705,"d":"4,705"}]
["Smoky vehicle notice",3,{"v":1219,"d":"1,219"},{"v":1404,"d":"1,404"},{"v":4464,"d":"4,464"}]
["Infringement notices",null,36,13,55]
["Official warnings",null,15,4,14]
["Litter programs"]
["Infringement notices",null,{"v":13403,"d":"13,403"},{"v":12859,"d":"12,859"},{"v":16527,"d":"16,527"}]
["1. While EPA undertook a lower number of inspections, a higher number of remedial notices and sanctions were issued, indicating more targeted inspections."]
["2. EPA has increased its focus on holding offenders to account; as a result, there were more official warnings and penalty infringement notices issued than in previous years."]
["3. EPA has identified a system issue that has impacted the number of notices issued for noisy and smoky vehicles. The issue is being investigated and is expected to be resolved in early 2015–16."]
[]
["Performance against government performance targets"]
["Table 6.10: Budget Paper No. 3 Service Delivery "]
["Indicator","note","2015 target","2015 actual"]
["Environmental condition research reports issued, improvement tools, guidelines, policies, systems and plans completed and issued",1,54,51]
["Increase in EPA notices issued for illegal dumping of waste",2,60,129]
["EPA prosecutions are successful, and conditions in enforceable undertakings (entered into under the Environment Protection Act 1970) are focused on, improving the environmental performance of the offer",null,{"v":0.9,"d":"90%"},{"v":1,"d":"100%"}]
["Land audits submitted by EPA-appointed auditors are reviewed to ensure compliance with statutory requirements and guidelines",null,{"v":0.9,"d":"90%"},{"v":0.93,"d":"93%"}]
["Notices complied with by due date or escalation in line with Compliance and Enforcement Policy",3,{"v":0.9,"d":"90%"},{"v":0.87,"d":"87%"}]
["When a pollution incident is reported to EPA and follow‑up contact is requested, the reporter receives this within three working days",null,{"v":0.75,"d":"75%"},{"v":0.86,"d":"86%"}]
["Works approvals and licences completed within required statutory timelines",null,{"v":0.96,"d":"96%"},{"v":0.99,"d":"99%"}]
["Output cost",4,"$134.1m","121.2m"]
["1.  A lower than expected number of publications was completed to enable appropriate consultation. EPA expects to meet the target in 2015–16."]
["2.  EPA's focus on illegal dumping of waste continues to result in an increased number of notices being issued for illegal dumping across Victoria."]
["3.  Performance reflects EPA having followed up on a higher number of remedial notices than in previous years."]
["4.  Output cost below expectations due to lower than expected distribution of grants to industry."]
[]
["Table 6.11: Minister’s Statement of Expectations 2014–16"]
["Measure","Target","2014–15 progress"]
["Approvals reform "]
["Pilot new approach to providing earned autonomy to high-performing EPA licensees ","Pilot launched by early 2015","Achieved"]
["Periodic reviews of the currency and effectiveness of EPA licence conditions","Prioritisation framework and procedures developed and reviews of licences commenced by 30 June 2015","Achieved"]
["Publication of EPA works approval summary assessment reports ","Published for all works approval decisions from 31 December 2014","Achieved"]
["Extend maximum duration of permits to transport prescribed waste or prescribed industrial waste from 12 months to five years","Five-year permits available by 30 June 2015 ","EPA will achieve efficiencies through other improvements outlined in the 2015–16 Annual Plan"]
["Audit reform"]
["Time taken by EPA for a clean up to extent possible (CUTEP) decision following submission from an environmental auditor ","90% within 56 days in 2014–15",{"v":0.9,"d":"90%"}]
["Percentage of CUTEP decisions exempt from approval by EPA (that is, decision made by the auditor)","25% in 2014–15",{"v":0.6,"d":"60%"}]
["Harmonisation of auditor appointment process with NSW EPA (pilot project for national harmonisation)","Auditors are appointed using the same criteria and similar processes by 30 June 2015","Achieved"]
["Guidance and information"]
["Quality of EPA’s guidance for duty holders","Establish and report on the percentages of duty holders that, in 2015–16 compared to 2013–14, regard:","In progress"]
[null,"(a) EPA’s guidance publications as accessible, sufficient and consistent"]
[null,"(b) the guidance contained in EPA’s remedial notices as clear and easy to understand"]
["Quality of information and support for the general public and for people who seek or report information on the activities of EPA and/or Victorian environmental issues, and for people reporting pollution, litter and smoky vehicles to EPA","Establish and report on the percentages of the general public, customers and community stakeholders that, in 2015–16 compared to 2013–14, regard:","In progress"]
[null,"(a) EPA’s information and support as accessible and meaningful "]
[null,"(b) EPA’s promotion of its compliance and enforcement activities and performance as effective"]
["Quality of information and support for organisations with delegated powers under the Act","Establish and report on the level of support that organisations with delegated powers report receiving from EPA to deliver those delegated functions, in 2015–16 compared to 2013–14","In progress"]

{"sheet":"Workforce data","index":1,"n_rows":67,"n_cols":11,"rows_kept":67,"merged":[[6,1,6,4],[7,0,8,0],[7,4,8,4],[7,5,8,5],[13,1,13,3],[13,4,13,6],[14,1,14,2],[14,4,14,5],[15,0,16,0],[15,2,16,2],[15,3,16,3],[15,5,16,5],[15,6,16,6],[43,1,43,2],[43,3,43,4],[43,5,43,6],[51,1,51,5],[51,6,51,10],[52,1,52,2],[52,3,52,4],[52,6,52,7],[52,8,52,9]]}
["Comparative workforce data"]
["Table 9.1: Full-time equivalent (FTE) staffing trends from 2011 to 2015"]
[null,2015,2014,2013,2012,2011]
["FTE",341,312,325,364,419]
[]
["Table 9.2: Summary of employment in June of 2014 and 2015"]
[null,"Ongoing employees",{"$nulls":3},"Fixed-term and casual employees"]
[null,"Employees","Full time","Part time","FTE","FTE"]
[null,"(headcount)","(headcount)","(headcount)"]
["2015-06-01",337,264,73,307.59,33.5]
["2014-06-01",327,263,64,301.54,10]
[]
["Table 9.3: Details of employment levels in June of 2014 and 2015"]
[null,2015,null,null,2014]
[null,"Ongoing",null,"Fixed-term and casual employees","Ongoing",null,"Fixed-term and casual employees"]
[null,"Employees","FTE","FTE","Employees","FTE","FTE"]
[null,"(headcount)",null,null,"(headcount)"]
["Gender:"]
["Male",150,147.22,14.5,143,141.5,7]
["Female",187,160.37,19,184,160.04,3]
["Total",337,307.59,33.5,327,301.54,10]
["Age"]
["Under 25",1,1,1,0,0,0]
["25–34",78,72.84,15.1,87,82.29,3]
["35–44",136,119.61,13.4,123,107.05,4]
["45–54",74,69.14,4,68,65.6,3]
["55–64",47,44.4,0,49,46.6,0]
["Over 64",1,0.6,0,0,0,0]
["Total",337,307.59,33.5,327,301.54,10]
["Classification"]
["VPS Grade 2",4,3.7,0,5,4.7,0]
["VPS Grade 3",73,68.58,10.8,61,57.32,3]
["VPS Grade 4",114,103.36,13.9,115,105.63,1]
["VPS Grade 5",104,94.17,5.8,102,92.99,1]
["VPS Grade 6",35,31.58,3,42,39.9,1]
["STS",2,1.2,0,2,1,0]
["Executive Officer",5,5,0,0,0,4]
["Total",337,307.59,33.5,327,301.54,10]
[]
[]
["Executive officer data"]
["An executive officer (EO) is defined as a person employed as a public service body head or other executive under Part 3, Division 5 of the Public Administration Act 2004. All figures in the following tables reflect employment levels at the last full pay period in June of the current and corresponding previous reporting year."]
["Table 9.4: Number of EOs classified into ‘ongoing’ and ‘special projects’"]
[null,"All",null,"Ongoing",null,"Special projects"]
["Classification","No.","Var.","No.","Var.","No.","Var."]
["EO-1",1,0,1,0,0,0]
["EO-2",4,4,4,4,0,0]
["EO-3",1,-3,0,-4,1,1]
["Total",6,1,5,0,1,1]
[]
["Table 9.5: Breakdown of EOs into gender for ‘ongoing’ and ‘special projects’"]
[null,"Ongoing",{"$nulls":4},"Special Project"]
[null,"Male",null,"Female",null,"Vacancies","Male",null,"Female",null,"Vacancies"]
["Classification","No.","Var.","No.","Var.","No.","No.","Var.","No.","Var.","No."]
["EO-1",1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0]
["EO-2",2,2,2,2,0,0,0,0,0,0]
["EO-3",0,-2,0,-2,0,1,1,0,0,0]
["Total",3,0,2,0,0,1,1,0,0,0]
[]
["Table 9.6: Reconciliation of executive numbers"]
[null,null,2015,2014]
[null,"Executives with remuneration over $100,000 (Financial Statement note 41)",5,4]
["Add","Vacancies (Table 9.5)",0,2]
[null,"Executives employed with total remuneration below $100,000",0,0]
[null,"Accountable officer (CEO)",1,1]
["Less","Separations",0,2]
[null,"Total executive numbers at 30 June",6,5]

{"sheet":"Office-based env impacts","index":2,"n_rows":82,"n_cols":7,"rows_kept":82,"merged":[[1,1,1,3],[1,4,1,6],[15,1,15,3],[15,4,15,6],[52,1,52,3],[52,4,52,6],[58,1,58,3],[58,4,58,6],[59,1,59,3],[59,4,59,6]]}
["Energy"]
["Indicator","2014–15",null,null,"2013–14"]
[null,"Electricity","Natural gas","Green power","Electricity","Natural gas","Green power"]
["Total energy usage segmented by primary source (MJ)",{"v":6131657,"d":"6,131,657"},{"v":14127588,"d":"14,127,588"},{"v":164015,"d":"164,015"},{"v":4537043,"d":"4,537,043"},{"v":18860427,"d":"18,860,427"},{"v":33636,"d":"33,636"}]
["Greenhouse gas emissions associated with energy use, segmented by primary source and offsets (tCO2e)",{"v":1700,"d":"1,700"},451,null,{"v":1664,"d":"1,664"},497]
["Percentage of electricity purchased as green power",{"v":0.03,"d":"3%"},null,null,{"v":0.01,"d":"1%"}]
["Units of energy used per FTE (MJ/FTE)",{"v":17977,"d":"17,977"},{"v":41419,"d":"41,419"},481,{"v":14563,"d":"14,563"},{"v":60539,"d":"60,539"},108]
["Units of energy used per unit of office area (MJ/m2)",583,{"v":1343,"d":"1,343"},16,431,{"v":1792,"d":"1,792"},3]
[]
["Table 10.4: Current performance against Sustainability Plan targets for energy use"]
["Measure","June 2016 target","Current progress"]
["Energy use per m2 per year","550MJ","583MJ"]
[]
["Waste"]
["Table 10.5: Waste"]
["Indicator","2014–15",null,null,"2013–14"]
[null,"Landfill","Commingled recycling","Compost","Landfill","Commingled recycling","Compost"]
["Total units of waste disposed of by destination (kg/yr)",{"v":2551,"d":"2,551"},{"v":12606,"d":"12,606"},{"v":4831,"d":"4,831"},{"v":2551,"d":"2,551"},{"v":13934,"d":"13,934"},{"v":5009,"d":"5,009"}]
["Units of waste disposed of per FTE by destinations (kg/FTE)",7.48,32.56,14.16,8.17,44.66,16.05]
["Recycling rate (percentage of total waste)",null,{"v":0.87,"d":"87%"},null,null,{"v":0.88,"d":"88%"}]
["Greenhouse gas emissions associated with waste disposal (tCO2‑e)",null,2.96,null,null,3.15]
[]
["Table 10.6: Current performance against Sustainability Plan targets for waste"]
["Measure","June 2016 target","Current progress"]
["Waste generated per FTE per year","60kg","59kg"]
[]
["Paper"]
["Table 10.7: Paper use"]
["Indicator","2014–15","2013–14"]
["Total units of copy paper used (reams)",{"v":2435,"d":"2,435"},{"v":2118,"d":"2,118"}]
["Units of copy paper used per FTE (reams/FTE)",7.1,6.8]
["Percentage of 75–100% recycled content copy paper purchased ",{"v":0.9881,"d":"98.81%"},{"v":0.9522,"d":"95.22%"}]
["Percentage of 50–75% recycled content copy paper purchased ",{"v":0,"d":"0.00%"},{"v":0,"d":"0.00%"}]
["Percentage of 0–50% recycled content copy paper purchased ",{"v":0,"d":"0.00%"},{"v":0.0478,"d":"4.78%"}]
[]
["Table 10.8: Current performance against Sustainability Plan targets for waste"]
["Measure","June 2016 target","Current progress"]
["Paper use per FTE per year",5,7.1]
[]
["Water"]
["Table 10.9: Water use (office facilities only)"]
["Indicator","2014–15","2013–14"]
["Total units of metered water consumed by usage types (kilolitres)",{"v":5489,"d":"5,489"},{"v":6199,"d":"6,199"}]
["Units of metered water consumed in offices per FTE (kilolitres/FTE)",16.09,19.9]
["Units of metered water consumed in offices per unit of office area (kilolitres/m2))",0.52,0.34]
[]
["Table 10.10: Current performance against Sustainability Plan targets for waste"]
["Measure","June 2016 target","Current progress"]
["Water use per year (kilolitres/m2)",0.28,0.52]
[]
["Transport"]
["Table 10.11: Transport"]
[null,"2014–15",null,null,"2013/14"]
["Operational vehicles","4 cyl diesel van","6 cyl","4WD","4 cyl diesel van","6 cyl","4WD"]
["Total energy consumption by vehicles (MJ)",{"v":977450,"d":"977,450"},{"v":1684215,"d":"1,684,215"},{"v":141012,"d":"141,012"},{"v":399157,"d":"399,157"},{"v":1908993,"d":"1,908,993"},{"v":398589,"d":"398,589"}]
["Total vehicle travel associated with entity operations (km)",{"v":350422,"d":"350,422"},{"v":431574,"d":"431,574"},{"v":38759,"d":"38,759"},{"v":128910,"d":"128,910"},{"v":526539,"d":"526,539"},{"v":104923,"d":"104,923"}]
["Total greenhouse gas emissions from vehicle fleet (tCO2e)",70,118,11,30,134,30]
["Greenhouse gas emissions from vehicle fleet per 1,000km travelled (tCO2e)",0.21,0.28,0.33,0.23,0.25,0.28]
["Air travel"]
["Total distance travelled by aeroplane (km)",{"v":466575,"d":"466,575"},null,null,{"v":579761,"d":"579,761"}]
["Travel to work","CBD","Metro","Regional","CBD","Metro","Regional"]
["Percentage of employees regularly (>75 per cent of work attendance days) using public transport, cycling, walking, or carpooling to and from work or working from home, by locality type",{"v":0.84,"d":"84%"},{"v":0.21,"d":"21%"},{"v":0.19,"d":"19%"},{"v":0.86,"d":"86%"},{"v":0.38,"d":"38%"},{"v":0.24,"d":"24%"}]
[]
["Transport targets"]
["Table 10.12: Current performance against Sustainability Plan targets for transport"]
["Measure","June 2016 target","Current progress"]
["Increase in fuel efficiency of vehicle fleet",{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},{"v":0.05,"d":"5%"}]
["Increase in use of public transport for work purposes",{"v":0.1,"d":"10%"},{"v":-0.17,"d":"-17%"}]
[]
["Greenhouse gas emissions"]
["Table 10.13: Greenhouse gas emissions"]
["Indicator","2014–15 ","2013–14 "]
["Total greenhouse gas emissions associated with energy use (tCO2e)",{"v":2152,"d":"2,152"},{"v":2213,"d":"2,213"}]
["Total greenhouse gas emissions associated with vehicle fleet (tCO2e)",191,238]
["Total greenhouse gas emissions associated with air travel (tCO2e)",115,165]
["Total greenhouse gas emissions associated with waste production (tCO2e)",2.96,{"v":3,"d":"3.00"}]
["Greenhouse gas emissions offsets purchased (tCO2e)",{"v":3200,"d":"3,200"},{"v":3200,"d":"3,200"}]
[]
["Greenhouse gas emissions targets"]
["Table 10.14: Current performance against Sustainability Plan targets for greenhouse gas"]
["Measure","June 2016 target","Current progress"]
["Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions since 2009–10",{"v":0.15,"d":"15%"},{"v":0.37,"d":"37%"}]