This layer is the result of a wilderness mapping project that was undertaken by the Parks and Wildlife Service (PWS) in 2005. The scope of the project was the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA) and some adjoining areas considered to be of high conservation area.
The project driver was to fulfill a requirement of the 1999 TWWHA Management Plan (p94);
"Develop an enhanced methodology for the quantification of wilderness which more accurately reflects the Tasmanian situation eg. incorporates the effect of the three dimensional nature of the terrain on viewfields and deals systematically with the effects of walkers' huts and walking tracks".
The methodology followed the guidelines of the National Wilderness Inventory (NWI) which was developed by the Australian Heritage Commission in the late 1980s and early 1990s to identify wilderness quality across Australia. The methodology is described in detail in the NWI Handbook of Procedures, Content and Usage (Lesslie and Taylor 1995). See hyperlink below for notes on the NWI from the Australian Heritage Commission website.
The plan notes (p92) that this is likely to involve the implementation of a modified version of the NWI methodology. However, it does not restrict the PWS to the use of this methodology.
The objective of the first phase of the project (Module 1) was to use the existing NWI methodology to assess wilderness values in the WHA and in specified adjacent areas, based on the latest available information on roads, walkers, huts and similar infrastructure.
In the second phase (Module 2), wilderness was to be assessed using revised criteria taking into account walkers' huts, tracks and time-remoteness. The assessment of viewfields has been postponed to a future study.
The business processes, input data, spatial analysis and results are described in the project methodology document, available in the hyperlink below.
The wilderness quality layer is a coverage that represents the level of naturalness and remoteness based on the proximity of physical intrusions and infrastructure. The study did not consider social aspects.
View dataset:
https://maps.thelist.tas.gov.au/listmap/app/list/map?bmlayer=3&layers=2406
Project methodology:
https://listdata.thelist.tas.gov.au/public/TWWHA%20Wilderness%20Value%20Assessment%202005.pdf
Project report:
https://listdata.thelist.tas.gov.au/public/TWWHA_Wilderness_Mapping_Report_2005.pdf
Commonwealth NWI methodology:
http://www.environment.gov.au/node/20141